Forgotten Profits Trade Setup Archive

Below you'll find Ian's setups stacked up and ordered chronologically. As this service once resided at another home, the alerts only go back to mid July. For a full track record, see the portfolio.

Are Demotech Insurance Ratings Putting Homeowners at Risk?

The Risks Behind Demotech’s Insurance Ratings in Storm-Prone States

As climate disasters intensify and major insurers retreat from high-risk markets like Louisiana and Florida, smaller insurance companies have filled the gap, often relying on Demotech insurance ratings to prove their financial stability. But a growing number of policyholders and consumer advocates are questioning whether those ratings truly reflect the companies’ ability to withstand severe weather events.

Demotech insurance ratings

A Promise That Didn’t Hold Up

For homeowners like Nadia Hart in LaPlace, Louisiana, an “A” rating from Demotech signaled trustworthiness. Hart, a disabled single mother, purchased a policy for her three-bedroom home through Lighthouse Excalibur Insurance, which had earned a top financial stability rating from Demotech. But when Hurricane Ida struck in 2021, Lighthouse collapsed under the weight of 16,000 claims, leaving Hart and thousands of others waiting years for payouts.

“I lost everything,” Hart said. “I assumed the A grade meant they could be relied on, but they collapsed so fast.”

How Demotech Became a Market Player

Demotech, a small Ohio-based rating firm, has built a niche by evaluating regional insurers that bigger agencies—like AM Best, S&P Global, and Kroll Bond Rating Agency—often ignore. Today, Demotech insurance ratings cover nearly 98% of the smaller insurers in storm-prone states, with 50.7% of Florida’s homeowners relying on companies graded by Demotech.

According to Demotech co-founder Joseph Petrelli, the firm’s mission is to ensure homeowners can access coverage where major insurers have pulled back. “We created this space,” Petrelli said. “No one else was interested in doing that at the time.”

A Track Record Under Scrutiny

Despite its efforts, Demotech’s ratings have come under fire for failing to predict insolvencies. A Wall Street Journal analysis found that insurers rated by Demotech were 30 times more likely to fail compared to those assessed by its larger competitors. Since 2017, 17 Demotech-rated home insurers have gone under, collectively leaving behind at least $1.7 billion in unpaid claims. All but one of the 15 property and casualty insurers that collapsed in Florida and Louisiana between 2021 and 2023 had an A rating from Demotech within a year of their failure.

Consumer advocates argue that the firm’s approach allows smaller companies to bet on weather risks without the reserves needed to weather catastrophic storms. “Consumers don’t want to trust their homes to highflying gamblers,” said Amy Bach, executive director of United Policyholders.

Why Ratings Matter So Much

A strong rating isn’t just about reputation—it’s often a requirement for securing a mortgage. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two largest U.S. mortgage-financing companies, require borrowers to hold insurance from companies rated “A” or higher. Without such ratings, insurers risk losing access to a large share of the homeownership market.

This dynamic has encouraged regulators to back Demotech’s efforts, as it provides more insurance options and relieves pressure on “insurers of last resort,” like Florida’s Citizens Property Insurance. In 2024 alone, Citizens moved over 200,000 policies to small insurers carrying Demotech insurance ratings.

Balancing Consumer Protection and Market Access

Petrelli acknowledges the challenges that come with rating smaller, less capitalized insurers. “We understand how difficult it has been for homeowners who lost coverage when certain insurers that Demotech rated became insolvent,” he said, citing “complex and fast-moving pressures” behind recent failures.

Yet the broader question remains: Can Demotech insurance ratings provide both the access homeowners need and the reliability they expect? For consumers like Hart, the answer feels far from clear.

Microsoft Azure revenue growth

Microsoft Surges Toward $4 Trillion Market Cap on Blowout Earnings and Cloud Growth

Microsoft (MSFT) is on the brink of making history again. Following a blockbuster fourth-quarter earnings report, the tech titan is poised to become the second U.S. company to reach a $4 trillion market capitalization—joining Nvidia in the exclusive club.

🔹 Q4 Earnings Crush Estimates

For its fiscal Q4, Microsoft reported:

  • Adjusted EPS: $3.65 vs. $3.37 expected

  • Revenue: $76.4 billion vs. $73.9 billion expected

  • Cloud Revenue: $46.7 billion, up 27% YoY

The beat was largely fueled by Microsoft Azure, which posted a 39% year-over-year revenue increase, outpacing analysts’ expectations of 35% and accelerating from the prior quarter’s 33% growth. For the full year, Azure revenue climbed to $75 billion, up 34% from 2024—solidifying Microsoft’s role as a global cloud leader.

🔹 The AI and Cloud Engine

Investor enthusiasm is being driven by two powerful engines: cloud computing and AI infrastructure. Azure’s performance, which is closely tracked as a bellwether of Microsoft’s enterprise strategy, underscores rising enterprise demand for cloud services amid the AI arms race.

The strong report follows a similarly impressive showing from Google Cloud, highlighting a broader trend in hyperscaler momentum.

🔹 Big Spending, Bigger Returns

Microsoft’s capital expenditures soared to $24 billion in Q4, well ahead of the $21.4 billion estimate. The company is pouring resources into building the infrastructure needed to support AI applications and large-scale cloud deployments.

While this figure will grow in the near term—$30 billion in capex is projected for Q1 2026—CFO Amy Hood assured investors that spending growth will moderate compared to fiscal 2025. Still, the company anticipates double-digit revenue and operating income growth in fiscal 2026.

🔹 Market Reaction and Milestone Watch

Shares surged 8.5% in after-hours trading, climbing to $556.60—well above the $538.13 threshold for Microsoft to hit a $4 trillion valuation. If gains hold through the next trading session, the software and cloud giant will become the second company ever to reach that valuation, trailing only Nvidia.

Year to date, Microsoft stock is up 22%, reflecting consistent investor confidence in its strategic pivot toward AI-powered services and cloud-first enterprise solutions.


🔍 Key Takeaway

Microsoft Azure revenue growth is once again proving to be the cornerstone of Microsoft’s market dominance. With record-setting capex, accelerating cloud adoption, and bullish guidance for 2026, Microsoft’s momentum seems unstoppable.

📈 As James Ambrose, director of Microsoft Investor Relations, put it:
“We closed out our fiscal year 2025 with a strong quarter that significantly exceeded expectations, driven by continued strong demand for our cloud and AI services.”

High-Risk Crypto Lending Returns with Unsecured Digital Loans

High-Risk Crypto Lending Returns:
New Players Bet on Unsecured Digital Loans

A new wave of high-risk crypto lending ventures is emerging, fueled by rising investor confidence and renewed interest in digital assets. Just three years after the collapse of major crypto lenders during the 2022 market crash, companies like Divine Research and 3Jane are experimenting with uncollateralized loans, betting that blockchain and artificial intelligence will reshape microfinance.

high-risk crypto lending

Divine Research and the Microfinance Revolution

San Francisco-based Divine Research has already issued roughly 30,000 short-term, unsecured loans since December, partnering with Sam Altman’s iris-scanning crypto group, World, to identify borrowers.

“We’re loaning to average folks like high-school teachers, fruit vendors—anyone with internet access,” said Diego Estevez, Divine’s founder. “This is microfinance on steroids.”

Divine offers loans of less than $1,000 worth of Circle’s USDC stablecoin, mainly to cash-strapped overseas borrowers underserved by traditional banks. Borrowers are screened using Altman’s biometric system, which prevents defaulters from creating new accounts. Interest rates range from 20% to 30%, with default rates on initial loans averaging around 40%.

High yields on the platform are attracting individual depositors, with Estevez claiming the system is designed so that liquidity providers “always make a profit” despite defaults. This approach reflects the growing appetite for high-risk crypto lending strategies.

3Jane’s AI-Powered Lending Model

Crypto startup 3Jane is also pushing the boundaries by offering uncollateralized USDC credit lines on the Ethereum blockchain. The company recently secured $5.2 million in seed funding from Paradigm, a venture group that previously invested in FTX.

3Jane requires “verifiable proofs” of crypto, bank assets, or cash flow, but no actual collateral. Defaulted loans are sold to U.S. collections agencies. The company is developing AI-driven lending platforms where “programmatically bound” AI agents would follow debt covenants, allowing for lower interest rates.

Wildcat, Clearpool, and the Next Phase of Lending

Other protocols like Wildcat are targeting professional market makers and crypto trading firms with customizable credit facilities. Wildcat has facilitated approximately $170 million in loans to date, enabling borrowers to negotiate terms such as interest rates and maturity dates.

“In the event of a default, lenders coordinate directly among themselves to seek recourse,” said Evgeny Gaevoy, Wildcat adviser and CEO of crypto market maker Wintermute.

This shift signals a maturing landscape for high-risk crypto lending, even as regulatory scrutiny and market volatility persist.

Lessons from the 2022 Crash

The return of unsecured lending comes with significant cautionary tales. In 2022, the crypto market crash triggered defaults and bankruptcies at firms like Celsius and Genesis. Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky was later sentenced to 12 years for fraud, while Genesis settled a $2 billion lawsuit with New York’s attorney general.

Despite these setbacks, major players like Coinbase, Tether, and Galaxy continue to dominate the crypto lending market, while Wall Street firms—including JPMorgan and Cantor Fitzgerald—are beginning to extend collateralized loans against cryptocurrency holdings.

The Road Ahead

With bitcoin trading near record highs and institutional interest returning, the high-risk crypto lending sector is poised for both growth and controversy. As AI-driven tools and blockchain protocols evolve, lenders are betting that this time will be different—but the risks remain as high as the rewards.