Forgotten Profits Trade Setup Archive

Below you'll find Ian's setups stacked up and ordered chronologically. As this service once resided at another home, the alerts only go back to mid July. For a full track record, see the portfolio.

Trump’s Emerging Market Behavior: How It Could Hit Markets

Trump’s Emerging Market Behavior: Is the US Beginning to Look Like Argentina?

For decades, the United States has been the world’s benchmark for financial stability, transparency, and institutional independence. Yet in President Donald Trump’s second term, analysts and economists are sounding alarms that the U.S. is starting to resemble the very emerging markets that investors have historically punished with lower valuations and higher risk premiums. The phrase Trump’s emerging market behavior is increasingly being used to describe a set of actions that are unsettling markets and could carry long-term implications for U.S. assets.

What Investors Mean by “Trump’s Emerging Market Behavior”

Emerging markets such as Turkey, Argentina, and China have long struggled with three themes:

  • Political interference in independent institutions.
  • Heavy-handed government involvement in the private sector.
  • Unsustainable fiscal spending.

Trump’s recent moves mirror these hallmarks. In just the past two weeks, the president has pressured Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to cut rates, fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, called for Intel’s CEO to resign, and demanded concessions from trading partners. These actions have fueled the narrative of Trump’s emerging market behavior, raising questions about whether U.S. markets still deserve the premium they have historically commanded.

Why It Matters for Stocks, Bonds, and the Dollar

For years, U.S. equities traded at valuations well above those of other markets. The S&P 500 averaged 17.5 times forward earnings compared with 11.5 in China and single digits in Turkey. That premium has been underpinned by the rule of law, central bank independence, and fiscal discipline.

If Trump’s emerging market behavior continues, investors could begin discounting U.S. assets like they do developing economies. Potential consequences include higher bond yields, a weaker dollar, and greater volatility in global markets. While AI-driven optimism has kept stocks strong, cracks could appear quickly if confidence in U.S. institutions erodes.

Corporate Intervention: China-Like Parallels

Another hallmark of Trump’s emerging market behavior is his influence over corporate affairs. Trump has pressured companies like Walmart not to raise prices, urged Goldman Sachs to fire its chief economist, and claimed discretion over billions in foreign investment pledges.

These tactics echo China’s approach to controlling private enterprise. Beijing famously took “golden shares” in companies like Alibaba and Tencent. Trump’s administration has already taken a similar “golden share” in U.S. Steel, raising concerns about government control over private-sector decision-making.

The Fiscal Deficit and Investor Patience

Perhaps the biggest risk tied to Trump’s emerging market behavior is fiscal. The U.S. deficit has surpassed $37 trillion, equal to 100% of GDP, with trillions more projected in the coming years. While Japan has managed higher debt loads, investors worry that political pressure on the Fed could limit its independence.

Countries like Argentina and Turkey show how fiscal overspending combined with central bank capture can lead to runaway inflation and currency collapses. The U.S. dollar’s reserve-currency status provides insulation, but even modest diversification away from Treasuries could raise borrowing costs and rattle markets.

What Traders Should Watch

For market participants, the implications of Trump’s emerging market behavior are clear: volatility is here to stay. Key areas to monitor include:

  • Bond auctions – Weak demand could signal stress in Treasuries.
  • Fed leadership changes – A pliant chair could undermine credibility.
  • Dollar trends – Continued weakness may point to structural shifts in reserve preferences.

Even if equities remain buoyed by AI-driven productivity, investors may demand a higher risk premium for U.S. assets if institutional credibility erodes. For traders, this environment means both risks and opportunities as volatility becomes the new norm.

Final Thoughts

The U.S. is not about to become Argentina or Turkey, but Trump’s emerging market behavior is challenging assumptions that have long underpinned American exceptionalism. Trade

Housing Market Correction Indicators

Housing Market Correction Indicators: 3 Key Trends to Watch

Despite appearing stagnant on the surface, the U.S. housing market is showing early signs of a potential shift—and possibly a correction. Economists are closely monitoring several key indicators to assess whether the market is merely cooling or heading for something more significant. Here are three housing market correction indicators analysts are watching:

housing market correction indicators

1. Days on Market Are Increasing

Homes are now taking longer to sell than at any time since 2017, according to Realtor.com. In July, the median time on market hit 58 days, a notable increase from the hyperactive post-pandemic years.

While not yet definitive, extended time on market—especially in major metros like Los Angeles, Dallas, Phoenix, San Francisco, and Seattle—could foreshadow a correction. Realtor.com economist Joel Berner cautions that if homes start sitting longer than even pre-pandemic norms, it could signal a pricing shift.

Adding to the uncertainty: an uptick in delistings, as sellers retreat in the face of softening demand. This reluctance to negotiate may limit price drops, frustrating bargain-seeking buyers.

2. New Home Construction Pullback

Builders, who typically have strong foresight into housing demand, are pulling back. June saw single-family housing starts fall to their lowest seasonally adjusted pace in a year, and permits for new builds also dropped sharply.

Zillow senior economist Orphe Divounguy explains that builders are reacting to a combination of rising costs and weaker pricing power. While many builders have been offering incentives to attract buyers—like rate buydowns or home upgrades—that trend may not last if construction continues slowing.

This could lead to fewer deals in the new home market and worsen the long-term housing shortage, further complicating affordability.

3. Employment and Inflation Could Drive Rates

July’s weaker-than-expected jobs report and downward revisions from prior months sent shockwaves through the bond market. The result: a drop in the 10-year Treasury yield, pulling mortgage rates down from 6.75% to 6.58%, per Mortgage News Daily.

Since mortgage rates are closely tied to broader economic indicators, the direction of employment and inflation data will be crucial going forward. Strong numbers could push rates up again, while weak reports may keep easing financing costs.

However, minor rate dips haven’t yet unlocked demand. “Small movements have not unleashed the pent-up demand,” says NAR’s Jessica Lautz. But a sustained decline could be the catalyst.

Conclusion

These three housing market correction indicatorsdays on market, construction trends, and economic data impacting mortgage rates—are forming a complex picture. Whether these signals mark a short-term pause or the beginning of a broader correction remains to be seen. But for both buyers and sellers, staying informed on these metrics is key to navigating what could be a pivotal phase in the U.S. housing cycle.

Uber’s Autonomous Ambitions Impact TSLA

Uber’s Autonomous Ambitions Spark Tesla Volatility: What Traders Need to Watch

Shares of Uber Technologies (UBER) climbed in early trading Wednesday after the company posted strong second-quarter earnings, beat across key metrics, and unveiled a $20 billion share buyback program.

But for traders focused on Tesla (TSLA), the more important story is Uber’s bold push into the autonomous vehicle space. CEO Dara Khosrowshahi revealed that Uber now has 20 autonomous partners globally and plans five new deployments in the second half of 2025, including in Dallas, Arlington, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Asia.

Uber autonomous vehicle strategy and Tesla stock

Uber’s Modular Strategy vs. Tesla’s Vertical Model

Unlike Tesla’s vertically integrated model, Uber is leveraging outside providers—an approach that may prove more flexible. While Tesla touts its proprietary Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, Uber is looking to scale quickly through strategic partnerships.

This raises questions about Tesla’s long-term competitive edge in self-driving technology, especially since Uber already has 180 million active monthly users averaging 6.1 trips each month—an instant scaling advantage.

TSLA Intraday Trading Outlook

While Tesla’s stock reaction has been muted so far, traders should watch for volatility driven by narrative shifts and sector rotation.

  • VWAP and Anchored VWAP setups can identify breakdown zones
  • First-hour range failures can lead to high-probability mean-reversion shorts
  • Use a TSLA/UBER intraday relative strength chart to spot divergence-based trades

Pro Tip: Anchor VWAP to 10:00 AM ET to track institutional positioning. Tesla tends to fade early overreactions when sentiment shifts are narrative-based rather than earnings-driven.

Market Implications of the Autonomous Race

Uber’s growth in autonomy isn’t a direct threat to Tesla’s hardware yet—but it’s a challenge to Tesla’s market perception and valuation multiple, both of which are tied to its leadership in the self-driving space.

Traders should monitor other mobility tech names like Aurora Innovation (AUR), Mobileye (MBLY), and Alphabet’s Waymo for sympathy momentum or sector rotation plays.

Final Thought: Tesla Isn’t Alone Anymore

Uber’s expanding footprint in autonomous vehicles adds real pressure to Tesla’s self-driving story. For traders, this translates to new volatility, new correlations, and new technical setups worth watching closely.

 

Pfizer Raises Guidance Amid Drug Pricing Pressure

Pfizer Raises Guidance Amid Drug Pricing Pressure: What Traders Should Know

 
Pfizer (PFE) raised its full-year earnings guidance this week, signaling early success in its multibillion-dollar cost-cutting strategy while navigating political pressure from President Donald Trump’s push to lower drug prices.The company now expects adjusted EPS between $2.90 and $3.10, up $0.10 from prior estimates. That revision came despite absorbing costs tied to a licensing deal with Chinese biotech 3SBio.

Shares rose 3.6% intraday in New York, marking a rare gain in a year where Pfizer has underperformed broader markets.

Pfizer earnings and drug pricing policy

Pfizer’s Margin-First Playbook

Pfizer is no longer leaning on blockbuster launches to drive value. Instead, it’s focused on margin expansion through strategic partnerships, operational efficiency, and cost control.

According to Daniel Barasa of Gabelli Funds:

“We expect Pfizer will continue to be a margin story, as opposed to a top-line driven story for the next few years.”

The $43 billion acquisition of Seagen in 2023 added to its drug pipeline, but revenue from those therapies may take years to mature.

Trump’s Push for Lower Prices: Risk or Opportunity?

Pfizer was one of 17 pharmaceutical companies that received a July 31 letter from President Trump, demanding “binding commitments” to lower drug prices or face regulatory consequences.

In response, Pfizer announced a partnership with Bristol Myers Squibb to sell a popular blood-thinner directly to consumers at a 40% discount starting in September. This aligns with Trump’s priority of direct-to-consumer access and price transparency.

However, TD Cowen cautioned that it’s unclear whether this model is a trend or a one-time strategy meant to placate regulators.

Intraday Trading: PFE as a Tactical Play

Pfizer’s intraday behavior makes it attractive for event-driven traders:

  • High institutional volume and tight spreads
  • Responsive to political news, especially on drug pricing and regulation
  • Frequent morning volatility followed by midday compression

Pro Tip: Use a VWAP reversion strategy around guidance updates or D.C. headlines. Pfizer typically reacts within the first 90 minutes, offering scalping and swing trade setups.

Investor Takeaways

  • Adjusted EPS guidance rose despite political headwinds
  • Pipeline from Seagen offers long-term growth but won’t help short-term metrics
  • Dividend yield remains attractive for income-focused investors
  • Valuation multiples could compress further if DTC models impact margins

Final Thought: Cautious Optimism, Tactical Opportunity

Pfizer may be down on the year, but its revised guidance, leaner operating model, and response to policy pressure suggest that it’s playing offense where many competitors are playing defense.

Teradyne stock performance 2025

Teradyne Leads the S&P 500 After Strong Earnings and AI Momentum

Teradyne (TER) shares surged Wednesday, topping the S&P 500 leaderboard after the company delivered solid second-quarter results and projected accelerating growth tied to artificial intelligence and next-gen computing.

The maker of semiconductor testing equipment saw its stock jump 19% to $107.96, setting it on track for its highest close since early March. Intraday, the stock climbed as high as $110.50, fueled by optimism over Teradyne’s improving outlook.

Teradyne stock performance 2025


💼 Q2 Snapshot: A Beat on Both Top and Bottom Lines

In earnings released Tuesday evening, Teradyne reported:

  • Adjusted EPS of 57 cents, beating Wall Street’s estimate of 54 cents

  • Revenue of $652 million, just ahead of the $651 million expected by analysts

While revenue declined 11% year over year and dropped from $686 million in Q1, investors appeared more focused on forward guidance and improving sentiment in key markets.


📈 Looking Ahead: Growth Signals for Q3 and Beyond

For the third quarter, Teradyne is forecasting:

  • Revenue between $710 million and $770 million

  • Adjusted earnings of 69 to 87 cents per share

That earnings range trails the 89 cents consensus estimate, but investors appear willing to overlook the modest shortfall in light of signs that semiconductor demand is stabilizing and that AI-related test equipment orders are gaining traction.

“As we progress through the third quarter, we are gaining confidence in AI compute-related revenue inflecting in the second half of the year,” said CEO Greg Smith during Wednesday’s earnings call.


🔍 Segment Spotlight: Semiconductor Test Equipment

Teradyne’s semiconductor test division accounted for $492 million of total Q2 revenue, underscoring its critical role in the company’s financials. Though markets like automotive and industrial electronics remain cautious, Smith expressed confidence that the worst of the order pullbacks is behind them.

“We do not expect test equipment order patterns to deteriorate further,” he said, adding that areas such as power semiconductors for data center expansion are showing strength.

Teradyne also expects the electrification of infrastructure and transportation to drive sustained growth past 2025.


🧠 AI Demand Powers the Narrative

Teradyne’s performance is increasingly tied to the explosive demand for AI infrastructure. The company, which counts Qualcomm and Texas Instruments among its customers, continues to emphasize that AI compute platforms are becoming a meaningful contributor to its testing systems segment.

“This is about preparing for a cyclical recovery,” Smith said. “We’re not just seeing stabilization—we’re seeing signals of resurgence.”


🏆 Market Reaction

By mid-day Wednesday, Teradyne was the best-performing stock in the S&P 500, outpacing peers despite broader market softness. The SPX index slipped 0.12%, but investors flocked to Teradyne as a rare tech hardware bright spot amid ongoing concerns about capital expenditures in other sectors.


📊 Bottom Line

Teradyne’s strong earnings beat and optimistic forecast—particularly regarding AI-related demand—have reinvigorated investor interest in the semiconductor testing space. Even with modest guidance for Q3 profits, the broader growth outlook appears to justify the rally.

As AI investments ramp up and cyclical end markets begin to stabilize, Teradyne may be positioned for a stronger 2026 and beyond—making it a name to watch closely in the hardware-driven AI ecosystem.

Super Micro (SMCI) Slashes Guidance

Super Micro (SMCI) Slashes Guidance—And Still Misses the Mark for Wall Street

Shares of Super Micro Computer Inc. (SMCI) plunged over 17% in premarket trading Wednesday after the company lowered its full-year revenue forecast and offered little reassurance on margins, despite booming demand for AI servers.

Super Micro SMCI earnings forecast

Management now expects at least $33 billion in revenue for the fiscal year ending June 2026—down from the $40 billion target it floated in February. Analysts remain skeptical. Consensus (FactSet) is only $30.5 billion, with Mizuho’s Vijay Rakesh forecasting $31B, citing “caution around ramps with competition increasing.”

Margin Pressures Mount Despite Revenue Growth

While demand for AI-optimized servers remains high, analysts warn that **price competition** and **gross margin compression** could limit upside. Rakesh noted Super Micro’s main rivals—including Dell Technologies (DELL) and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (HPE)—are aggressively cutting prices to capture market share.

J.P. Morgan’s Samik Chatterjee wrote that the combination of falling gross margins and bullish revenue expectations is creating a disconnect: “The underperformance is extending to gross margins as well.”

Market Reaction: Expectations Too High?

Despite beating consensus revenue targets, the stock cratered 17%. Analysts say this move reflects “elevated expectations vs. a significant shift in institutional investor opinions.”

Wedbush’s Matt Bryson noted that while bulls may focus on large AI customer growth potential, bears are watching for “underwhelming revenue guidance and a dearth of gross margin improvement.”

Intraday Trading Setup: SMCI in Play

For traders, SMCI now presents a high-beta opportunity with well-defined risk-reward scenarios:

  • Watch for VWAP rejection in the first hour if buyers attempt to fade the gap down
  • Opening Range Breakdown setups may trigger further downside if key support fails
  • Support zones near the $740–$760 range could become decision points

Pro Tip: Anchor VWAP to the earnings call timestamp and monitor for price/volume divergence. High options volume suggests elevated volatility is likely to persist.

Competitive Landscape: NVIDIA’s Pie Is Getting Sliced

Super Micro has benefited from demand tied to Nvidia’s Blackwell platform, but it’s not alone. With Dell, HPE, and smaller rivals targeting the same customer base, SMCI’s ability to maintain both share and margins is under pressure.

CEO Charles Liang touted the company’s “end-to-end data-center software solution” as a competitive edge—but analysts remain cautious until it materially improves profitability.

Final Thought: Reality Check for the AI Infrastructure Trade

Super Micro’s reset doesn’t end the AI story—it just reminds investors that even darlings of emerging tech must defend their margins and manage competitive risks. For now, SMCI looks like a stock that needs to earn its multiple all over again.

 

Ford Faces $2 Billion Tariff Hit as Profit Outlook Slumps, EV Strategy in Spotlight

Ford tariff impact 2025

Ford Motor Co. is feeling the sting of rising trade tensions. On Wednesday, the automaker warned investors that tariff-related costs are now expected to total $2 billion in 2025—a $500 million increase from its previous estimate in May. While the company reaffirmed its annual guidance, the lowered profit forecast underscores the mounting pressure from policy changes and shifting global demand.


📉 Profits Slashed as Trade Pressures Grow

Ford now projects adjusted earnings between $6.5 billion and $7.5 billion for the year—well below its $10.2 billion in 2024 earnings and its initial February projection of $7 billion to $8.5 billion.

The company attributed the revised forecast to:

  • A gross tariff impact of $3 billion

  • Offset by $1 billion in mitigation measures, including supply chain adjustments and strategic sourcing

“Ford continues to monitor developments closely and engage with policymakers to ensure U.S. autoworkers and customers are not disadvantaged by policy changes,” CEO Jim Farley told analysts on the earnings call.

Shares fell 1.6% in after-hours trading, after dropping 2% during the regular session.

308


⚙️ Q2 Results: Revenue Up, Earnings Down

Despite macro headwinds, Ford’s second-quarter revenue climbed 5% year-over-year to $50.2 billion, beating FactSet’s consensus estimate of $45.8 billion. Highlights include:

  • EV revenue doubled to $2.4 billion

  • Adjusted EPS came in at 37 cents, above analyst expectations of 33 cents, but down from 47 cents a year ago

  • The company recorded $800 million in Q2 tariff-related costs


🚗 A Strategic Pivot: Less Volume, More Focus

Ford is narrowing its focus to segments where it can thrive—especially in a global EV market increasingly shaped by regulatory uncertainty, price wars, and shifting consumer behavior.

“We’re not betting on high-volume, generic vehicles,” said Farley. “We’re doubling down on what we do best: trucks, iconic nameplates, and profitable, tech-forward EVs.”

On August 11, the company will host an EV showcase at its Kentucky facilities, which Farley teased as “a Model T moment for us at Ford.” The presentation will outline Ford’s next-generation EV strategy, including:

  • A tighter product portfolio with only a few EV models

  • Segment-specific targeting, focusing on commercial, truck, and utility EVs

  • An emphasis on partnerships to boost profitability and global scale


📊 Analyst Reactions: Visibility Improves, But Challenges Remain

Fitch Ratings analyst Stephen Brown said Ford appears to be making progress in cost management and suggested that reinstating guidance indicates greater confidence in navigating tariff impacts.

CFRA’s Garrett Nelson, however, emphasized the challenges ahead:

“The company’s earnings outlook highlights just how tough the current environment is for automakers,” he said.


🌐 Context: Industry-Wide Implications

Ford’s tariff exposure mirrors broader concerns across the automotive sector as trade policy, particularly around EV components and raw materials, becomes a central risk factor. With battery supply chains and electronics imports increasingly subject to new levies, automakers must reassess sourcing and pricing strategies.

The pressure is compounded by:

  • Rising EV competition from China and South Korea

  • U.S. policy shifts targeting supply chain localization

  • Slowing EV adoption rates in some U.S. regions due to charging infrastructure limitations and high vehicle costs


🧭 Bottom Line

Ford’s $2 billion tariff impact in 2025 highlights a critical challenge facing global automakers: balancing innovation with economic and geopolitical uncertainty. While the company continues to show resilience in key segments, especially EVs and trucks, it is entering a crucial phase where profitability, policy, and product strategy must align.

As Farley puts it, Ford’s future hinges on building fewer vehicles—but building the right ones.

Trump’s EU Deal Leaves Markets Guessing

Trade Truce or Powder Keg? Trump’s EU Deal Leaves Markets Guessing

In a week already brimming with geopolitical uncertainty, a fragile U.S.–EU trade agreement has injected fresh volatility into global markets. European Union officials announced that they would suspend their €93 billion in retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods—despite lingering ambiguity around the deal brokered last month in Scotland between President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

While the two sides reached a political handshake, the specifics of the trade agreement remain unsigned and unresolved, leaving traders and corporate stakeholders uncertain about what the coming weeks will bring.

Trump EU trade deal and tariff impact

Friday Deadline: New U.S. Tariffs Set to Hit

Trump signed an executive order imposing a 15% tariff on most EU imports, effective Friday. The EU, facing the prospect of a major trade war, opted to freeze its retaliatory measures for now, but tensions remain high—especially in sectors like German autos, French wine, and European steel.

What’s at Stake for the Markets?

1. Auto Industry in the Crosshairs

The fate of European car exports to the U.S. is still unclear. Germany, home to BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen, is particularly vulnerable. Any delay or denial of tariff exemptions could trigger weakness in U.S.-listed ADRs and global auto stocks.

2. Wine, Spirits, and Luxury Goods

The EU is lobbying to exempt wine and spirits from the 15% tariff, with France and Italy leading the charge. Failure to secure carve-outs could pressure luxury and consumer discretionary sectors.

3. Steel and Aluminum Quotas

The EU seeks tariff rate quotas (TRQs) for steel and aluminum—lower tariffs for volumes within historical norms. The U.S. has yet to sign off, leaving uncertainty for manufacturers.

4. Chemical and Medical Device Exemptions

The EU also wants exclusions for chemicals and medical devices. Ongoing negotiations will determine their inclusion in the exemption list.

Geopolitical Undercurrents

This trade détente follows Trump’s recent ultimatum to Russia regarding Ukraine. The intersection of trade diplomacy and geopolitical strategy reflects Trump’s broader effort to use economic leverage as a negotiating tool across multiple fronts.

European leaders remain concerned about U.S. security guarantees and are cautious about ceding too much ground in trade talks that could set lasting precedents.

Market Outlook: Risk-On or Risk-Off?

  • Short-Term: Volatility in European export sectors is likely until more clarity emerges.
  • Medium-Term: Sanctions on Russia or further policy shifts could spark risk-off moves and safe haven flows.
  • Long-Term: A deglobalization trend may take root, reshaping supply chains and pressuring multinational profitability.

Final Thought: A Trade Deal Without Teeth?

Despite the truce, many critical details are unsettled. The EU’s retaliatory tariffs remain “in the freezer”—not abandoned. For traders and investors, this means more headline risk, more volatility, and more reliance on fast-moving policy updates.

TraderInsight Pro Tip: Monitor U.S. and EU trade announcements, shipping indices, and FX pairs like the EUR/USD for signs of pressure. Tariff news has become a key market-moving catalyst in 2025.

 

Intel’s new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan at the center of a high-stakes battle

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan Faces Internal Rift, Political Pressure, and Strategic Crossroads

Intel’s new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, has been in the job for just a few months, but already finds himself at the center of a high-stakes battle — one that spans boardroom disputes, political interference, and strategic questions that could reshape the semiconductor industry. For traders, this drama isn’t just a corporate soap opera. It has real implications for chip sector valuations, U.S.–China tech tensions, and the broader market’s appetite for semiconductor risk.

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan controversy

The Boardroom Showdown

From the moment Tan took the reins in March — a move that initially sent Intel’s shares up over 13% — it was clear he had big plans. A turnaround veteran who previously led Cadence Design Systems, Tan entered with a vision to reinvest in Intel’s manufacturing capacity, pursue AI acquisitions, and shore up the company’s lagging competitive position against Nvidia and AMD.

But Intel’s board, led by Chairman Frank Yeary, has not been entirely on board. The two sides reportedly clashed almost immediately over whether Intel should remain in the chip manufacturing business — a segment that last year supplied about a third of Intel’s revenue but has been a persistent money-loser. Yeary had explored spinning off the foundry division entirely, potentially bringing in strategic investors like Nvidia or Amazon, or even selling to Taiwan’s TSMC.

Tan, by contrast, views domestic manufacturing as a cornerstone of Intel’s future and a strategic necessity for U.S. national security, particularly in an era where Washington is laser-focused on reducing reliance on foreign suppliers.

Deals Delayed and Opportunities Lost

  • Capital Raise Stalled – Tan wanted to move quickly on a multibillion-dollar capital raise to strengthen Intel’s balance sheet and accelerate investment in fabrication plants. The board slowed the process, possibly delaying it until 2026.
  • AI Acquisition Slips Away – Intel had targeted an AI company to close the gap with Nvidia and AMD in machine learning and data center hardware. But the board’s slow deliberation left the door open for a rival bidder.
  • Partnerships That Fizzled – Recent strategic partnerships have fallen apart, adding to the sense that Intel is losing time in a fast-moving market.

The company has responded by cutting costs — including a 15% workforce reduction — and slowing construction on new U.S. and European plants. As Tan told staff, “Every investment must make economic sense.”

Political Storm Clouds

The corporate power struggle took a dramatic turn when former President Donald Trump publicly called for Tan’s resignation, citing “conflicts” tied to his past business relationships with Chinese firms. This follows the Justice Department’s $140 million settlement with Cadence Design — the company Tan ran until 2021 — over sales to a Chinese military university.

Political pressure intensified when U.S. senators from both parties — including Republican Tom Cotton and Democrat-turned-Republican Bernie Moreno — questioned Tan’s suitability for the role. Trump’s intervention also comes as his administration is reshaping semiconductor policy, leaning more heavily on tariffs and revisiting CHIPS Act agreements.

This political overlay adds an extra layer of uncertainty for traders: even if Tan survives the boardroom fight, he may have to navigate a hostile policy environment that could shape Intel’s capital access, government contracts, and customer relationships.

What It All Means for Traders

  1. Short-Term Volatility – Any news on Tan’s status, whether it’s his resignation, board restructuring, or new political attacks, could trigger sharp moves in INTC shares.
  2. Sector Spillover – Intel’s strategic decisions affect not only its own stock but also competitors like AMD, Nvidia, and TSMC.
  3. U.S.–China Trade Sensitivity – Tan’s ties to Chinese firms, coupled with Trump’s aggressive tariff agenda, put Intel squarely in the crosshairs of geopolitical risk.
  4. AI Race Implications – Delays in AI-related acquisitions and R&D could widen the gap between Intel and its AI-heavy rivals.
  5. Policy-Driven Plays – With Washington rethinking the CHIPS Act, politically aligned companies may enjoy a valuation premium.

The Bigger Picture

Intel’s fate under Tan is a microcosm of the modern tech-industrial landscape: a once-dominant player struggling to adapt, an internal tug-of-war between financial pragmatism and strategic sovereignty, and political actors willing to shape corporate leadership for national security aims.

For traders, the lesson is clear: INTC is not just a semiconductor stock anymore — it’s a geopolitical asset, a restructuring story, and a volatility generator all in one.

Trader’s Risk/Reward Playbook

Scenario Market Impact Potential Trade Risk Factors
Tan Stays & Gains Board Support Relief rally in INTC; sentiment improves on perceived stability and clarity of manufacturing strategy. Long INTC on breakout above resistance; look for follow-through in semiconductor ETFs (SMH, SOXX). Political attacks could still weigh; execution risk on delayed deals.
Tan Resigns Initial sell-off on uncertainty, potential rebound if replacement seen as market-friendly. Fade initial panic for swing trade; watch for leadership signals from new CEO pick. Volatility could spike; risk of further strategic drift.
Intel Exits Manufacturing Short-term pop on cost-cutting narrative; long-term risk to U.S. supply chain positioning. Short-term long on momentum; hedge with puts if narrative turns national security-focused. Backlash from policymakers; risk of losing strategic customers.
Major AI Acquisition Secured Strong bullish sentiment; narrows competitive gap with Nvidia/AMD. Long INTC; pair trade long INTC/short weaker AI laggards. Integration and execution risk; overpayment concerns.
Escalating U.S.–China Tensions Broad semiconductor sector volatility; INTC under pressure due to scrutiny of Tan’s ties. Hedge with inverse semiconductor ETFs; short INTC on tariff headlines. Fast-moving headlines; risk of policy reversal.

In short, Intel is now a headline-driven trading instrument. For active traders, the key is agility — be ready to pivot positions as the political, strategic, and boardroom narratives evolve.